Thus spake Gandhiji

-As a congressman and a Hindu, I say that I wish to give Muslims what they want. I would like the Muslims to put down whatever they want on a blank sheet of paper and I shall agree to it.-

-To resist  Muslim atrocities by hindus using violence and intimation is tantamount to fratricide. Even if Hindus had died to a man, it would have been deliverance of Hinduism and Islam would have been purified in this land. As it was, a third party had to intervene. Neither the Hindus nor the muslims have gained by this intervention. If India has to be an independent nation, one or both must cease to seek British protection. My advice is satyagraha first and satyagraha last !- ( WoW !!!)

-Now you will perhaps understand why I have called Abdul Rashid ( who was indicted for killing Swami Shraddhanand)a brother and I repeat it. I do not even regard him guilty of Swami’s murder. Guilty indeed are those who excited feelings of hatred against one another.-

-The brave and God fearing Moplahs ( Muslims of malabar who massacred more than 2500 hindus in 1921) are fighting for the religion as understood by them by a method they feel that their religion enjoins them to adopt .-

-For the proper conduct of the experiment of non-violence, it does not behoove that both parties believe in non-violence. If both believe so, the success of non violence will not be proved.-

-Such a service ( fighting for the British) would furnish the Indians an opportunity to prove their mettle and disprove the allegations frequently made by the Europeans that they were mostly cowards.-

-Animals are our brethren, lion and tiger included. We don’t know how to live with carnivorous beasts and poisonous reptiles because of our ignorance.-

-If the choice is between cowardice and violence, I would advice violence. I am an opponent of violence even if it is for the noblest of causes.-

-It is sinful to buy and use an article made by sweated labor.-

-The rule should be – No labor, no meal.-

What did Gandhi tell the Jews facing Holocaust in Europe ?

Recently there was a movie about Gandhiji’s correspondence with Adolf Hitler. I do not know his exact advice to Adolf, but I came across what he wanted the Jews to do.
Let us not forget, Hitler was in the process of implementing the ‘final solution’ to the Jewish problem in Europe – that is the total liquidation of the entire Jewish population. It was destruction of human lives on an industrial scale. Jewish Men, women and children were taken in droves to the gas chambers across occupied Europe.

And this is what Gandhiji wrote to the Jewish leaders. :
“…the German persecution of the Jews seems to have no parallel in history. The tyrants of old never went so mad as Hitler seems to have gone. And he is doing it with religious zeal. For he is propounding a new religion of exclusive and militant nationalism in the name of which any inhumanity becomes an act of humanity to be rewarded here and hereafter. The crime of an obviously mad but intrepid youth is being visited upon his whole race with unbelievable ferocity. If there ever could be a justifiable war in the name of and for humanity, a war against Germany, to prevent the wanton persecution of a whole race, would be completely justified.”

So, Gandhi recognizes that, this is a war which could be justified. But then he goes on ...
“But I do not believe in any war. A discussion of the pros and cons of such a war is therefore outside my horizon or province.”

So for Gandhi, whatever the situation, “war is not the answer.”
And what should the Jews do in the face of imminent annihilation?
“Germany is showing to the world how efficiently violence can be worked when it is not hampered by any hypocrisy or weakness masquerading as humanitarianism. It is also showing how hideous, terrible and terrifying it looks in its nakedness.
Can the Jews resist this organized and shameless persecution? Is there a way to preserve their self-respect, and not to feel helpless, neglected and forlorn? I submit there is…If I were a Jew and were born in Germany and earned my livelihood there, I would claim Germany as my home even as the tallest gentile German may, and challenge him to shoot me or cast me in the dungeon; I would refuse to be expelled or to submit to discriminating treatment. And for doing this, I should not wait for the fellow Jews to join me in civil resistance but would have confidence that in the end the rest are bound to follow my example. If one Jew or all the Jews were to accept the prescription here offered, he or they cannot be worse off than now. And suffering voluntarily undergone will bring them an inner strength and joy which no number of resolutions of sympathy passed in the world outside Germany can. Indeed, even if Britain, France and America were to declare hostilities against Germany, they can bring no inner joy, no inner strength. The calculated violence of Hitler may even result in a general massacre of the Jews by way of his first answer to the declaration of such hostilities. But if the Jewish mind could be prepared for voluntary suffering, even the massacre I have imagined could be turned into a day of thanksgiving and joy that Jehovah had wrought deliverance of the race even at the hands of the tyrant. For to the godfearing death has no terror. It is a joyful sleep to be followed by a waking that would be all the more refreshing for the long sleep.”

What can be a more callous disregard of suffering ?
He is casually suggesting the Jews use his method of sathyagraha against the Nazis. If it could save the Jews, fine. But if not, then at least they would be massacred while doing the right thing. 

Gandhiji had the same advice for his own people:
“During his prayer meeting on 1 May 1947, he prepared the Hindus and Sikhs for the anticipated massacres of their kind in the upcoming state of Pakistan with these words: “I would tell the Hindus to face death cheerfully if the Muslims are out to kill them. I would be a real sinner if after being stabbed I wished in my last moment that my son should seek revenge. I must die without rancour. You may turn round and ask whether all Hindus and all Sikhs should die. Yes, I would say. Such martyrdom will not be in vain.” (Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, vol.LXXXVII, p.394-5) It is left unexplained what purpose would be served by this senseless and avoidable surrender to murder.
Even when the killing had started, Gandhi refused to take pity on the Hindu victims, much less to point fingers at the Pakistani aggressors. More importantly for the principle of non-violence, he failed to offer them a non-violent technique of countering and dissuading the murderers. Instead, he told the Hindu refugees from Pakistan to go back and die. On 6 August 1947, Gandhiji commented to Congress workers on the incipient communal conflagration in Lahore thus: “I am grieved to learn that people are running away from the West Punjab and I am told that Lahore is being evacuated by the non-Muslims. I must say that this is what it should not be. If you think Lahore is dead or is dying, do not run away from it, but die with what you think is the dying Lahore…”

 “He who is kind to the cruel ends up being cruel to the kind.”